Enron Mail

From:kay.mann@enron.com
To:david.fairley@enron.com
Subject:Re: MDEA Contract Revision Questions
Cc:heather.kroll@enron.com, reagan.rorschach@enron.com
Bcc:heather.kroll@enron.com, reagan.rorschach@enron.com
Date:Tue, 22 May 2001 02:38:00 -0700 (PDT)

Hi David,

Either email or handwritten works for me. I would just as soon have
everything now, if it is possible to get it to me in the today or tomorrow.

In discussing the extension yesterday, the consensus was that we should
extend until June 29th. If the deal gets done sooner, we can always have the
new doc supercede the old one. I'm copying Heather and Reagan so that they
can let me know if I've got it wrong.

Thanks,

Kay


From: David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/22/2001 09:14 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MDEA Contract Revision Questions

Kay -- Just some housekeeping questions:

Do you want hand-written or e-mail comments going forward?

Do you want more comments from Origination and Services now, or do you want
us to wait until you turn the doc? As I said yesterday, I am in the process
of sorting out the "Costs" definition so that it works better with the other
parts of the doc.

MDEA is willing to extend the ILA two weeks if we want to. Their next Board
meeting (after tonight's Board meeting) is June 12 , and they desperately
need to have our contract finished in time to get signing approval at that
meeting. We probably need something to bridge us from the end of May until
their Board votes on the full agreement. The other option is to get done
this week and have them call a special Board meeting. They have done this in
the past, but we have not asked them if it's logistically possible to do this
by May 31.

Thanks -- David