Enron Mail |
1)
3) I think we want it to apply to whatever entity employs the individuals with access. Most of these people will probably Peoples Energy Corp. employees, but I suppose we could make it also include all of their affiliates. enovate can sign the CA as well, but since enovate doesn't have any employees I was assuming we could use Peoples Energy as the responsible legal entity. 4) After 3:00 is fine, let me know for sure soon enough that I can lock Sarah up. Thanks, Gregg Kay Mann 10/31/2000 11:29 AM To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: enovate stuff 1)The cybergoblins ate the attachment. 2) OK 3) Which Peoples is it? Also, I think enovate should sign at CA. 4) I sent Heather an email re her availability. There's a bunch of construction near downtown, so I would hesitate to commit to an early call, but I know I'm free after 300 tomorrow. Kay From: Gregg Penman on 10/31/2000 11:25 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: enovate stuff Kay - 1) Attached is my quick attempt at writing something to make the management changes at enovate that we discussed. Could you please review this and add the appropriate legal language. I don't think that we need any Board approval for any of these changes, so is some type of notification sufficient? 2) I would like to address the idea of signature authorities other than Laura at the same time. My suggestion would be that Richard and myself be granted some level of authority to execute CA's, Master Agreements, etc. that have been reviewed and approved by legal. If you can at least pull the template you used to get approval for the Director you mentioned and see if there would be any changes necessary that would be helpful. 3) I need to get the CA form for the curves and other information started. We can discuss this any time you want. 4) What is your availability tomorrow either 8-9:15 or after 3:00 to discuss the intercompany loan agreement, and will Heather be available? I will be leaving around 2:00 for suburban trick or treating. Thanks, Gregg
|