Enron Mail

From:scott.healy@enron.com
To:kay.mann@enron.com
Subject:Comments on Sections 11-17
Cc:stephen.plauche@enron.com
Bcc:stephen.plauche@enron.com
Date:Wed, 25 Oct 2000 04:11:00 -0700 (PDT)

1. Section 11.1--Do we insert adjustment to purchase price for acceptance
test here?
2. Section 11.1--Do we need to make a reference outstanding issue on
termination and reversion to average pricing?
3. Section 11.1--Adjustments for Force Majeure continue to make me nervous.
Where do we narrow the application of this provision?
4. Section 11.6.2--Can we add FCE's language with a note that we are
currently reviewing?
5. Section 14.1.1--Should we say "electric" industry standards?
6. Section 14.1.1 (a)--Did we agree to give up?
7. Section14.2--Do we have enough information to write a rough version?
8. Section 15.1--Is payment withheld while working to improve performance?
If not, then title transfer seems ok. Otherwise, I don't know.
9. Section 17.2--need to incorporate concept that units at site at time of
termination notice and accepted within 2 months of notice get paid for. All
other units are terminated. We also have the average price issue.
10. Section 17.4--How do we handle a default by Seller in combination by a
purchaser delay. I think that a unit at site which is subject to a Purchaser
delay should get a day for day relief from the two month acceptance criteria
and the guaranteed acceptance dates. Do you agree?