![]() |
Enron Mail |
I think that is a great observation. I would suggest that the language be
fairly broad to include both potential assignees and potential investors/joint-venturers. You might also consider anticipating some of our counterparties' concerns by including a provision like this . . . . so long as such potential assignee or potential investor/joint venturer enters into an agreement to protect the confidentiality of such information. This is an easy give because we always get a CA in place before disclosing information. I would steer clear of any modification to that provision which requires (i) a minimum term for the CA, (ii) agreement by the counterparty to the form of CA or (iii) the proposed assignee or potential investor to put itself in direct privity with the counterparty. Just my thoughts Stuart
|