|
|
Enron Mail |
Kay,
Just a couple minor edits. One, this amendment only covers 4 Standard Base Exhaust Stacks, so to reference the dwgs for the Heavy Base Exhaust Stacks and Extensions isn't necessary and could be confusing to somebody "down the road". The other adds the October 31, 2000 delivery date for the stacks. How's the other Amendment related to Brazil? John Ayres told me yesterday that he found it hung-up waiting on instruction and permission slip. Now, it's supposedly unstuck, with Kathy Clark. Can you cut it loose? Also, we have another Amendment in the works to add a Step-up Transformer for ENA - West, Pleasanton, CA. I believe Sharon Tweed has this one in the works per the Portland gang. Not sure where you and Kent stand on the review of the LV Expansion Facility Agreement. Maybe we can visit by phone on Monday? Lee -----Original Message----- From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 5:36 PM To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com Subject: LM 6000 change order #2 ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/04/2000 05:35 PM --------------------------- (Embedded Enron North America Corp. image moved to file: From: Kay Mann pic30170.pcx) 10/04/2000 12:50 PM To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: LM 6000 change order #2 Kent, Here's a revised change order #2. Please let me know if you have any comments: (See attached file: GEco#2rev1.doc) Thanks, Kay
|