Re: FW: Change Order #3

Lee:

Looks good except I've gotten approval based on unit #19 being delivered on
May 15, based on our discussion last week. I'm happy to go back, but I think
the payment schedule should tie to the unit delivery; i.e. either push the
payment schedule back, or move the unit delivery date forward.

Let me know how you want to proceed.

Thanks,

Ben

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 09/13/2000 09:26:39 AM
To: ben.f.jacoby@enron.com
cc: kathleen.clark@enron.com
Subject: FW: Change Order #3

Here's the change order for the schedule change related to LV Cogen II
units.

< -----Original Message-----
< From: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
< Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:26 PM
< To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP); 'chris.booth@enron.com';
< 'kay.mann@enron.com'
< Subject: Change Order #3
<
< Lee, Chris and Kay:
<
< Attached is a draft of the Change Order #3 for the Las Vegas Cogen
< project. Kay, I will be in Houston on Monday through Wednesday afternoon,
< but will be busy most of Tuesday. Lee had hoped that we could get
< together, or at least talk, about this and the facility agreement and
< payment for Change Order #2. How is your late Monday afternoon looking?
<
< Kent
<
< <<Amendment Number 3.doc<<

- Amendment Number 3.doc