|
|
Enron Mail |
Privileged and Confidential
Attorney-Client Communication Per our conversation, attached is the latest draft of the Interconnection Agreement. This draft reflects TECO's comments, Enron's comments, and my own comments. At this stage, rather than clean up all drafting issues (and there are many), it is probably most important to focus on conceptual matters. That said, the most significant conceptual revisions from the previous draft are the addition of the Notice to Proceed concept, the addition of Conditions Precedent concept, and revamping the Milestone provisions. As for drafting matters -- the previous draft had many undefined terms, which I have now defined. Also, there were many sections with concepts repeated in other sections but stated differently and with slightly different obligations. To avoid confusion and a potential dispute as to the controlling section, I have deleted repetitive sections. (For example, Section 4.14 and 18.5 address disconnection after termination of the Agreement, but each is worded differently and has somewhat different provisions. I have deleted the old Section 4.14.). Also, I have made some clarifications to ambiguous language. There are still several open issues that we should discuss prior to providing this draft to TECO. I should be available throughout the day, so we can discuss the attached. Andy <<8R@301!.DOC<< Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
|