![]() |
Enron Mail |
Thanks much. We really appreciate your help on this.
Has a follow up meeting been set for next week as discussed in our call of last week? We would like to send a representative (or two) and would be happy to set a meeting up. Please let me know. Regards, Ben DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKrey@swpc.siemens.com< on 05/09/2001 02:02:19 PM To: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com< cc: Monahan Bill <Bill.Monahan@swpc.siemens.com<, Carlos.Sole@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com, Jim.Bouillion@enron.com, Saugstad Kathryn <Kathryn.Saugstad@swpc.siemens.com<, Nemec Frank <Frank.Nemec@swpc.siemens.com<, Ruiz Javier A <Javier.Ruiz@swpc.siemens.com< Subject: RE: Issuance Confidentiality Agreements Ben Drawings were sent to Chuck Newell today. As you stated, we need Sharon's CA before Chuck can share technical detail with her. Regards Lynn DeKrey -----Original Message----- From: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com [mailto:Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:35 PM To: DeKrey Lynn Cc: Monahan Bill; Carlos.Sole@enron.com; Kay.Mann@enron.com; Jim.Bouillion@enron.com Subject: Re: Issuance Confidentiality Agreements Lynn: Thanks for the e-mail. If Chuck's CA has been executed and returned to you, then I would assume you can go ahead and send him the drawings. I understand that if Sharon wants the drawings, she will have to sign a seperate CA. Sending the drawings to Chuck, covered by his executed CA, will certainly speed up the process. Let me know if you have any objections. Thanks, Ben
|