|
|
Enron Mail |
OK.
-----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 4:16 PM To: Jacoby, Ben Subject: RE: TECO I vote for you. From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 04:08 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: RE: TECO Do you want to send the LOI to TECO, or should I? -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:32 PM To: Mitro, Fred Cc: Jacoby, Ben Subject: RE: TECO I don't believe we need Keffer's input to process the LOI. I can have their power guy look at the term sheet if we think we are done with it. From: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 12:42 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: RE: TECO Kay: I will review your comments on the LOI. I wanted to check with make sure that someone at King & Spalding is reviewing the Midway term sheet along with the LOI, so that we can send the term sheet to TECO on Monday/Tuesday. Let me know. Fred -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 11:45 AM To: Jacoby, Ben; Mitro, Fred Cc: jkeffer@kslaw.com Subject: TECO Ben, I made a minor adjustment to the LOI re: exclusivity. << File: Midway TECO LOI june 1.doc << Policy states that any time we sign up to exclusivity we are supposed to get it approved by Mark Metts, Tim Detmering and the CEO of the affected business unit. Seems a little silly in this case, but it can't hurt. (yes, I know we didn't do it with the turbine stuff) Kay
|