|
|
Enron Mail |
As a matter of convenience, John simply sent to Matt his working version of
the contract. This particular draft included some of his suggested changes to those sections dealing with default as well as some of the cleanup that we discussed re performance guarantees, LD's, ect. but should not impact the tax analysis. By the way, John has run his comments re the default sections by me and has also sent them to you for comment before we launch to GE. Do you have any additional comments re his rewrite on the default provisions? Agree that there should only be one draft (controlled by Peter) and in fact, John is in the process of sending Peter an Email today, if time permits, re his suggested changes so that they can be incorporated into the PT contract draft. Also, was there any consensus on the time for the weekly call tomorrow? Kay Mann@ENRON 05/15/2001 09:17 AM To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: Re: GE- World Hunger John, I noticed a different file name on this draft than the version Pete Thompson sent out. How is this version different from Pete's? I sure hate to have more than one version of this monster being vetted at the same time. Thanks, kay
|