|
|
Enron Mail |
That is the home run that I want to hit with this form, Scott, but GE needs
to give us a few days to work out an approach on that. I will discuss it with Sheila on how to approach the issue from the EWS perpective JWVS Scott Dieball 05/15/2001 12:39 PM To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate@ENRON Subject: Re: World Hunger Contract GE thinks that once we finalize the terms of this contract that this contract will form the basis for future purchases by Enron and not just ENA. Do we need to involve other Enron biz units in the sign off process? Kay Mann@ENRON 05/15/2001 11:41 AM To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, pthompson@akllp.com, John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Subject: World Hunger Contract Hi there. I am attaching for the group's consideration a red line that I ran comparing the current working draft (v4) with the draft John R. recently circulated to Tax and Insurance. I suggest that Pete Thompson keep the typewriter on this. We are getting so close to the end, I would really like to try to avoid confusion. I am also attaching a clean copy of the current active version, and the current list of issues under consideration. I suggest we work through this list and turn another draft before soliciting Cris/Herman and Lisa's comments. We should also give the ENA commercial reps the opportunity to review it at that time. Kay
|