|
|
Enron Mail |
Well, you must be famous in the I bank bidness, as she claims to know you.
From: Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/10/2001 10:54 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: CA Development - revised documents Never worked at Chase. Worked at Citi. -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 10:54 AM To: Bills, Lisa Subject: RE: CA Development - revised documents She says you worked together at Chase. From: Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/10/2001 10:50 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: RE: CA Development - revised documents Kay, welcome back. The intent is that the document package should be sent together, if not immediately after delivery of Notice. When are you expecting the package to be delivered? Can't it be this pm? I'm reviewing the notices now. By the way, who is Laurie Mahon? Lisa -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 9:00 AM To: Bills, Lisa Cc: Engeldorf, Roseann; Ondreko, Roger; Jacoby, Ben; Mitro, Fred; Clark, Catherine Subject: RE: CA Development - revised documents Hi Lisa, I'm back, and will finish up these docs this am. The notice provision does not require that all the closing documents be completed as of the date of the notice, although I expect to have the package finished anyway, including the CA II documents. We expect the escrow to be funded today, so as far as I know we will want to give notice today, although it might be later than the am, depending on when the escrow is funded. Ben, Fred, are you ready for us to give notice? Kay PS. Laurie Mahon says "hello". From: Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/08/2001 07:21 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Catherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: RE: CA Development - revised documents Kay, I see that the Notice is dated January 10th with a closing on January 18th. If you are not back to clean these documents revised and CA II completed until Wed am, I don't see how we can provide Notice on the am of January 10th. Also, is the 18th an absolute purchase date so Catherine can work with Ben to calculate how much money goes to TurboPark and how much we pay to GE? Notice Ag: Does "Confirmed by" mean the same thing as "Consented to" legally? Would think so but CSFB wants us to Consent so let's make sure we have the strongest of the two language formations. Assumption Ag: Pg 2, Clause 1: insert ")" after Administrative Agent. Pg 2, Clause 3: insert "and otherwise with respect to the Property" at the end of the last sentence. Bill of Sale: Last para: Need to insert purchase date at end rather than "January 2001." Schedule 1: Insert ")" after "Assigned Equipment". Look forward to knowing the final notice and closing date. -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Monday, January 8, 2001 6:38 PM To: Bills, Lisa; Engeldorf, Roseann; Ondreko, Roger; Jacoby, Ben; Mitro, Fred; Clark, Catherine Subject: CA Development - revised documents Here's a set of CA I revised docs. If these are ok, we will get CA II lined up as well. << File: Assumption with GE ack(CAEDI)rev2.DOC << << File: Bill of salerev2.DOC << << File: Purchase Option Notice(CAED I)rev2.doc << I'm on the road tomorrow, but should be back in the office on Wednesday am. Kay
|