|
|
Enron Mail |
Enron is entitled to an additional output guarantee when we have 6 or more
units installed in a facility. Peter missed the point, and I didn't catch it because I really didn't look at FV very closely at all. Rigby caught it. He disagrees with how we massaged his original language for this additional guarantee, and I will try to figure out his point. Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/17/2001 10:47 AM --------------------------- "Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com< on 01/17/2001 10:46:15 AM To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com< cc: Subject: RE: Comparison of GE Facility Agmt with OriginalFormAgreement.D OC No. I apologize. I do not know why it was deleted. -----Original Message----- From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 11:30 AM To: Thompson, Peter J. Subject: RE: Comparison of GE Facility Agmt with OriginalFormAgreement.D OC Pete, I'm sending you a fax regarding some changes requested by NEPCO/EECC (our affiliate). From what he has sent me, it does not seem that the Fountain Valley contract contains the optional guarantee that is in effect for plants comprised of 6 or more units. It would seem to be applicable in this case. Was it deleted intentionally? Thanks, Kay
|