|
|
Enron Mail |
Many thanks.
When I first started in the E & C bidness all our company did was cost plus work. I may have some old exhibits about how the mulitplier was used to capture benefits and burdens, both for field people and home office. You know the goal is to never create an original document! Kay Davidlu@nepco.com on 02/01/2001 12:23:43 PM To: Kay.Mann@ENRON.com, IMCEAEX-_O=ENRON_OU=NA_CN=FOREIGN+20CONTACTS_CN=NEPCO_CN=DLUND@ENRON.com, john.schwartzenburg@enron.com, John.G.Rigby@ENRON.com, Peter.Nassab@ENRON.com cc: Mark.Bernstein@ENRON.com, jude.rolfes@enron.com, STEVED@nepco.com, MikeR@nepco.com, danielh@nepco.com, Patricia@nepco.com Subject: RE: Cost plus contract for Co Op City Kay, I got your message this morning. Enjoy the big apple. I presume you got my mark ups on the term sheet. I am investigating with the NEPCO folks if they have any particular form of cost plus contract. JWVS just informed me he had one that he will forward to me. I know from past history that NEPCO is not set up from an accounting viewpoint to give a lot of detailed breakdown of costs in terms of labor hours, burdens and benefits since they are calculated and charged to a project based on assignment of people. I'll stay in touch. David H. Lund, Jr. Assistant General Counsel National Energy Production Corporation 11831 North Creek Parkway N. Bothell, WA 98011 425-415-3138 Fax: 425-415-3032 David.Lund@nepco.com or davidlu@nepco.com -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 10:07 AM To: Lund, David; Schwartzenburg, John; Rigby, John; Nassab, Peter Cc: Bernstein, Mark; Rolfes, Jude Subject: Cost plus contract for Co Op City Importance: High Gentlemen, As Dave and John know, I'm working on a deal for ENA (and with Jude) which has as one aspect a cost plus EPC contract for the construction of a power plant. We need to put together the T's and C's for a cost plus contract, and since it is possible that NEPCO might be the contractor, I wanted to use something that is acceptable to NEPCO. I will then take the laboring oar in order to get a working draft prepared for this project. As always, I'm on a short time frame, so your response would be appreciated. Thanks, Kay
|