|
|
Enron Mail |
Billy,
It is expected that by the time the hard costs referenced in #2 are incurred, the project will be in E Next (or its successor/take out vehicle) since construction will be nearly complete. Costs incurred in #3 should be Phase 2 E Next costs, since this should be in the construction period, although it could be immediately prior to that time. Lisa, I skipped Rose on this email since she is out of town, and reviewed this agreement before she left. Kay From: William Fleenor/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/04/2001 09:46 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: Deerfield development agreement See comments therein. -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:01 PM To: Fleenor, William Subject: Deerfield development agreement Hi Billy, Can you take a look at this since the Hermanator is out? Thanks, Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/01/2001 02:00 PM --------------------------- Kay Mann 05/31/2001 06:48 PM To: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Herman Manis/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Ben Jacoby/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven Krimsky/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: Deerfield development agreement Hello. The commercial team has asked that I forward this document to you for review. It is a development agreement for a project in Florida. We have attempted to address the accounting/E-Next issues, but please advise of any desired changes. Thank you, Kay << File: Deerfield development ag May 31.DOC << PS Pardon the formatting. It will be cleaned up by those with the ability to do so.
|