Enron Mail |
I agree. Please revise the form accordingly.
Thanks, Kay "Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com< on 01/12/2001 09:35:53 AM To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com< cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com<, "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com< Subject: RE: Fountain Valley/GE Facility Agreement I have reviewed both the ABB and GE Agreements and have spoken to Paul about this issue. I do not believe it is necessary for the amount of consideration to be listed in the final lien form. I believe that ABB and GE can simply acknowledge that Seller has been paid in full or that Purchaser has paid all sums owing to Seller under the agreement, or similar language. -----Original Message----- From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:24 PM To: Thompson, Peter J. Cc: Alan. Larsen (E-mail); Kay Mann (E-mail); Sheila Tweed (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris Subject: Re: Fountain Valley/GE Facility Agreement Pete, I have a question. Is it necessary for the amount of consideration to be listed in the final lien form (exhibit R or S, something like that)? If so, what amount goes in there? Will this defeat what we are trying to do in keeping the original price a supposed mystery? Thanks, Kay
|