|
|
Enron Mail |
I think that's fine.
"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com< on 05/16/2001 09:55:02 AM To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com< cc: Subject: RE: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help I will be available at 1:30 pm CST today. With regard to turning the document, I will be traveling on Thursday. Therefore, I believe the earliest I could have a draft of the agreement (w/o exhibits, w/o override letter) is Friday evening. If we could wait until Monday delivery, I could have drafts of both the agreement and exhibits. -----Original Message----- From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:59 AM To: Thompson, Peter J. Subject: Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help fyi ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/16/2001 08:58 AM --------------------------- From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 05/16/2001 08:49 AM To: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help (Document link: Kay Mann) Yes. Let's do 1:30 for an internal call. I'll get Suzanne to send out the dial-in instructions. Let's make sure that the GE guys know NOT to call in. Thanks!. I know that John Schwartzenburg will be late since he is TurboParking until 2 pm but let's proceed at 1:30. Scott Dieball@ENRON_D To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT EVELOPMENT cc: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, John 05/16/2001 Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 07:15 AM Subject: Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help(Document link: Sheila Tweed) Read your notes re scheduling a call w/ or w/o GE. From John's and my perspective, it seems that we should first have an internal call re the consolidation of our assignments from weeks past into Peter's draft contract and then send to GE for their review and follow up call either later this week or next. Steve Swift is OK with this approach. At the moment we seem to be knee deep w/GE and Owner on Arcos and suspect that 9:30 CST (3:30 London time) will be difficult for us to call in. Instead, 1:30 CST would work better for us. If this works for the Houston gang could you let us know soonest and we will let Mike and Steve know as well. Sheila Tweed@ECT To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Kay 05/15/2001 Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron 04:18 PM Subject: Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help(Document link: Scott Dieball) Would you all be in a posiotion to get together tomorrow morning at 9:30 am Houston time to review the issues list and talk about how we get to the end of this process with GE. We immediately need to start the drafting of the Longview turbine contract and I'd like to see if we are close enough to get that started. Scott, today the extension to the Agreement in Principle expires and we need to extend. Can you tee this up with Steve Swift? Our meeting tomorrow will be in lieu of the regularly scheduled GE call. I'll let them know we will call them later this week or we'll talk next Wednesday, but I would like to get through whatever we need to in order to get the Longview Turbine Contract going. I've talked to John Schwartzenburg about this and he is available tomorrow morning.
|