![]() |
Enron Mail |
Ok. So basically all bets are off if we don't give NTP by September
whatever. Sounds good. "Stan Jensen" <sjensen@bracepatt.com< on 06/26/2000 02:20:46 PM To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com< cc: Subject: Re: Assignment and Assumption Agreement related to GE contract The Notice to Proceed Effective Date is not a set date but rather the day that the notice to proceed is given so long as certain other conditions are also in effect on such date (such as either financial close or the Enron Guaranty] <<< <Kay.Mann@enron.com< 06/26 2:16 PM <<< Stan, I have one minor question. Is the Notice to Proceed Effective Date a set date, or is it x days following y event? I would expect to see language along the lines of "If notice to proceed is not given by the Notice to Proceed Effective Date, then...". I see the deleted language was something close to that, so maybe in the context of this EPC different terminology is used. Kay "Stan Jensen" <sjensen@bracepatt.com< on 06/26/2000 02:01:26 PM To: <msuzuki@nyc.mitsui.com<, <K.Ishimatsu@xm.mitsui.co.jp< cc: <kay.mann@enron.com<, <Max.Yzaguirre@enron.com<, <Sheila.Tweed@enron.com<, <Steve.Irvin@enron.com< Subject: Assignment and Assumption Agreement related to GE contract Attached is a redline that highlights minor proposed revisions to the assignment contract you sent earlier today. Please feel free to call me at (713) 221-1524 with any questions. Stan Jensen (See attached file: GEAssign4.doc)
|