|
|
Enron Mail |
I used to work at EECC, so I know that noone controls that group!
There is a place in the agreement for a contract number. I think we ought to use the same contract number as before, but add a distinguishing number or letter- like FV or LVCG. How does that sound? Kay Alan Larsen@ECT 12/12/2000 10:49 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: CO for Fountain Valley Kay--I left you a voice mail apologizing for your being bombarded with general questions about the C.O.s for Fountain Valley. My intention was that EE&CC would get the CO into final shape, and just pass it on to you at the point it was ready for GE signature. I do have one question though, in light of Dale's note below: how we want to identify the Fountain Valley breakout, as opposed to the previous GE master agreement. Thanks. Al Larsen ---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT on 12/12/2000 08:37 AM --------------------------- Dale Rasmussen 12/11/2000 07:30 PM To: Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: CO#6 for Fountain Valley The way the process works as I understand it, is this: Last week we developed forms of breakout contracts for each of the turbine "groups" (1 for LV, 1 for Fountain Valley, etc.). In order to accomplish changes to the individual breakout contracts reflecting changes to project-specific turbines, it was decided that rather than issue any additional change orders under the master (24 unit) contract, either (a) the individual breakout contracts would be modified prior to execution to reflect the changed information; or (b) change orders would be issued under the individual breakout contract. I worked with the crew last week on the form of breakout contract for the LV turbines. I haven't done any change orders under that contract. As I interpret the attachment below, the required modification is to change the reference from CO#6 to the master contract to CO #1 to the Fountain Valley breakout contract. Of course, I may be missing something here. I did an earlier change order to the master contract that I could forward, if that would help. Alan Larsen 12/11/2000 04:43 PM To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: CO#6 for Fountain Valley Dale--I understand that you have done Ge change orders breaking out the LV Cogen equip. Could you send me a copy of your breakout C.O.? Thanks. Al ---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT on 12/11/2000 04:33 PM --------------------------- Kay Mann@ENRON 12/11/2000 03:37 PM To: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com cc: Ed.Dannhaus@enron.com, mtezyk@enron.com, lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: CO#6 for Fountain Valley Gentlemen, Since we are moving the equipment from WestLB and into TurboPark, and since we are just about there with the breakout contracts, we need to process this as change order #1 to the Fountain Valley contract. I also believe we need the site specific stuff for this project. Kay michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com on 12/11/2000 03:17:27 PM To: Kay.Mann@enron.com, Ed.Dannhaus@enron.com, mtezyk@enron.com cc: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com Subject: CO#6 for Fountain Valley All, Attachment contains latest revision reflecting order for two additional stacks, six power stabilizers and moving cost for the Fountain Valley Project. Please review and let me know if additional changes are required or recommended. <<changeorder#6rev2.doc<< Please note new contact information below: Mike Storm g GE Aero Energy Products ___________________________________ A GE Power Systems Business Michael E. Storm Projects Phone: (281) 864-2601 Dial Com 8*326-2601 Fax: (281) 864-2116, Pager 888 487 5741 - changeorder#6rev2.doc
|