|
|
Enron Mail |
I think the effective dates have been relating to when the deal was cut.
That's as much a guess as anything. Ben left me a voice mail that said he had gotten something from ESA on #3, but I haven't made it through all my emails to see if I have it. I will send it to you if I do, of course. I would think #4 is ready as soon as I get confirmation that the dates are correct. Again, I have to check my emails. I heard a rumor about 5 (but am now drawing a blank), and haven't heard of any others. Kay Enron North America Corp. From: Lisa Bills 10/17/2000 09:51 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: Change order #2, PSCO Kay, from a general financing perspective the below looks fine. For all these change orders, why do we keep having to make them effective long before they are actually executed? I am concerned because for both WestLB and TurboPark, we need to provide the executed change orders to them on a timely basis. Doesn't look so timely when we keep back dating documents. I am very confused with Change Order Numbers also. I received the executed Change Order 1. Any idea where we are on 3, 4 and 5? Any others on the horizon that you know of? Regards, Lisa Enron North America Corp. From: Kay Mann 10/16/2000 06:41 PM To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Subject: Change order #2, PSCO Is this ok with everybody? It incorporates GE's latest comments. Kay
|