Enron Mail

From:kay.mann@enron.com
To:carlos.sole@enron.com
Subject:Re: Delta - ENA Consent Jurisdiction Issue
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 16 Apr 2001 04:11:00 -0700 (PDT)

I don't think she's in. You might want to leave her a voice mail.


From: Carlos Sole on 04/16/2001 11:08 AM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: kay.mann@enron.com

Subject: Delta - ENA Consent Jurisdiction Issue

Sheila, in connection with the Delta turbine sale, we have one pending issue
with respect to the jursidiction clause that would have us consent to either
NY state or federal court (you had revised the document to only have NY
federal courts apply, but the Lenders have responded that they need the state
court reference in the event that the federal courts will not take the
case). Attached is the redline to show how the clause has been revised to
eliminate the waiver of forum non-conveniens and how the jurisidiction will
only apply to the consent agreement, but I'd like your approval to accept NY
state court as well. In the alternative, Lender's counsel has commented that
in another Enron transaction they were involved with, they accepted Delaware
state and federal courts. Also, please note that the opinion letter is no
longer required. Thanks in advance:
Jurisdiction and Process
5.8 ENA AGREES THAT ANY LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING
TO THIS CONSENT AND AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT EXECUTED IN CONNECTION
HEREWITH, OR ANY LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING TO EXECUTE OR OTHERWISE ENFORCE
ANY JUDGMENT OBTAINED AGAINST ENA, FOR BREACH HEREOF, OR AGAINST ANY OF ITS
PROPERTIES, MAY BE BROUGHT IN THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK OR THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BY THE
COLLATERAL AGENT OR ON BEHALF OF THE COLLATERAL AGENT, AS THE COLLATERAL
AGENT MAY ELECT, AND ENA HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY SUBMITS TO
THE NON-EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF SUCH COURTS FOR PURPOSES OF ANY SUCH LEGAL
ACTION OR PROCEEDING. ENA HEREBY AGREES THAT SERVICE OF PROCESS IN ANY SUCH
PROCEEDING MAY BE EFFECTED BY MAILING A COPY THEREOF BY REGISTERED OR
CERTIFIED MAIL (OR ANY SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR FORM OF MAIL), POSTAGE PREPAID,
TO IT AT ITS ADDRESS SPECIFIED BELOW ITS NAME ON THE SIGNATURE PAGES HEREOF
OR AT SUCH OTHER ADDRESS OF WHICH EACH NOTEHOLDER SHALL HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED
THERETO. IN ADDITION ENA HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT
PERMITTED BY LAW, ANY OBJECTION WHICH IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE
LAYING OF THE VENUE OF ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATING TO THIS CONSENT AND AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT EXECUTED IN
CONNECTION HEREWITH BROUGHT IN THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK OR THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, AND ANY
CLAIM THAT ANY SUCH SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING BROUGHT IN ANY SUCH A COURT
HAS BEEN BROUGHT IN AN INCONVENIENT FORUM.



Carlos Sole'
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002-7361

(713) 345-8191 (phone)
713 646-3393 (fax)
----- Forwarded by Carlos Sole/NA/Enron on 04/16/2001 10:56 AM -----

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com<
04/16/2001 09:49 AM

To: "'carlos.sole@enron.com'" <carlos.sole@enron.com<
cc:
Subject: FW: Pegasus - ENA Consent



Carlos:

The only two changes we requested to the ENA Consent that Isabel Parker did
not make were as follows:

1. Section 2.1(f) - no deletion of "best" from knowledge; and
2. Section 5.8 - no deletion of NY "state court" jurisdiction.

I have not spoken to Isabel about these last items, so I don't know if they
were inadvertent or intentional, although my e-mail to her was fairly
specific about Enron accepting federal court jurisdiction in NY but not NY
state court. Note that it is rather unusual to object to NY state court
when federal courts in NY are considered acceptable. Please review and let
me know. Thanks.


Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com<



-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 8:47 AM
To: Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)
Cc: John Tisdale (E-mail); Jack Wallace (E-mail); O'BRIEN, Lisa; VAN
DUSEN, Nicholas
Subject: Pegasus - ENA Consent


This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person: to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation. Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.






I attach a clean and blacklined copy of the ENA Consent, showing the changes
from the version last circulated.

This should now be in final form. Please let me know if you have any
further comments.

Kind regards
Isabel





Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

- COMPARE001.DOC
- NY003699617.DOC