|
|
Enron Mail |
Cc: john.schwartzenburg@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: john.schwartzenburg@enron.com X-From: Kay Mann X-To: Sheila Tweed X-cc: John Schwartzenburg X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf My recollection is that the original ABB contract was assigned into TurboPark without revisions/restatement/consent, or a break out contract. I think EECC had the typewriter on the original contract. I quickly looked in my TurboPark binders, but didn't immediately find the ABB contract. There was a breakout contract done for the CA Development deal, and Pete Thompson (with AK out of DC) would have generated that document. It wasn't approved by the TurboPark team since it was entered into by the Enron LLC post TurboPark. I wasn't involved in the Fountain Valley transformer contract, but my guess would be that Pete Thompson worked on it. The footer you described sounds like an AK footer. Kay From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 03/27/2001 09:53 AM To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Fountain Valley Transformer Contract - FT Pierce -no approvals yet Kay Mann did the Abb transformer contract and I think that she used A&K-- Paul Pepitone? John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 03/27/2001 09:42 AM To: Sheila Tweed@ECT, Roseann Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Barton Clark@ECT, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James C Davis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, davidlu@nepco.com Subject: Fountain Valley Transformer Contract - FT Pierce -no approvals yet The Fort Pierce crowd is pressuring for a form of transforner contract.Of course it must be TurboPark compliant. Since we have just done a transformer agreement with ABB for Fountain valley and its all signed off on by ABB, TurboPark, Rose atal, and the new project lenders, I would like to start with that form and ot reinvent the wheel. The ABB form that is in the TurboPark closing binders has a footer that reads "WAS:83848.6". I assume that either A&K or LLGM had the typewriter. Sheila or Roseann, I would appreciate it if one of you could get the firm that has the document on their computers to send it out, with the attachments, so Bart and the Ft Pierce team could get to work on it. We also have the hard copy override letter with ABB that make the TurboPark corrections, and we can either add these directly to the contract or leave it as an override letter. Mr. Lund, can you check at NEPCO and see if anyone there has electronics on this? Next, for equipment that will be bought by Purchase Order instead of under a contract, we need the TurboPark bits that go into the PO, since we will be getting a lot of requests to issue PO's next. Roseann, could you send us what you have in mind forthe PO's, or should we just take the override letter, add it into the PO form, and let you see what we are doing? Last, Jim Davis called to see where we are in the TurboPark cycle and if issuing a PO or Contract (ie., making a commitment) is ok at this point. Jim, thanks for making sure the loops are closed. Bart gave me a voice mail that we do not have a DASH approval or other authorization. Therefore I ask at this point that Jim not issue any paper on the project until we get clearance from Bart and Roseann. Thanks JWVS
|