![]() |
Enron Mail |
I'm still not wild about 27.5, which says they have no liability for any
advice they give us which is not required by the agreement. It seems that we could get into an argument about causation of a problem, and what was in/out of their scope under the agreement. I don't know that I have any brilliant ideas about how to narrow this carve out. I guess we could say no liability so long as the advice is clearly outside the scope of work, and is given in good faith and in accordance with industry standards. Martin W Penkwitz 08/21/2000 11:18 AM To: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: GE Form - Revisions as to Indemnity and LOL Scott: Please see the attached redlined copy of the referenced provisions. Please review and give me a call with any questions you may have. Marty Martin Wm. Penkwitz Enron North America Corp. - Legal 1400 Smith St. Suite 3840 Houston, TX 77002 713.345-7101 Martin.W.Penkwitz@enron.com
|