Re: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

Hi Ben,

Just wanted you to know that I received your email, and will follow through
on the change order. I should be in the office on Thursday am, if not
sooner. As you can see, I'm picking up email, and can also be reached on my
cell phone.

I reviewed your email re: VEPCO. We do have a project entity to use, and
Accounting (and Global Finace) have been involved on the MTM and off balance
sheet issues. I suspect we will find out about the need for a guarantee
soon.

It was good to get your input on VEPCO. There's lots to do on that one.

Kay

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
08/07/2000 06:27 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

Kay and Kathy:

Please make the effective date of the change order the date of execution. I
have separately followed up on Lisa's DASH question, and we should be in a
position to execute the change order after this is clarified.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 04:38 PM
---------------------------

From: Lisa Bills @ ENRON 08/07/2000 06:09 PM

To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chip
Schneider/NA/Enron@Enron, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

Here are my comments after reviewing the below change order: (i) the cover
page refers to an enron 2-99 deal which does not correspond to the cover page
of the executed turbine purchase contract with GE. To what does this refer
if a different deal and if the same deal, please conform. (ii) the effective
date is stated as March 6, 2000. Given that the agreement between Enron and
WestLB and the purchase agreement between WestLB and GE weren't signed until
May 12, 2000, if any backdating is needed (I'd like to understand why it is
for new equipment orders), it can't be before May 12th. With respect to the
effective date and the overall placement of the order, has this $4.65MM
acquisition been dashed? The current effective dash only contemplated the
turbines, not any ancillary equipment. I believe Chip Schneider is the RAC
contact for this transaction.

Regards, Lisa

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
08/07/2000 10:32 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

Lisa and Herman:

Please review the attached change order. We would like to have your comments
back, if any, in the next couple of days so we can execute the contract by
Friday. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 08:43 AM
---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/07/2000 09:31 AM
To: Chris Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/07/2000 09:30 AM ---------------------------

Enron Engineering & Construction Company
From: Kathleen Clark 08/07/2000 09:28 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2 Revised

Kay & Scott:

Attached is a revised draft of Change Order #2 for your review.

Since the draft of 7/20/00, we have added two additional exhaust stacks at
$233,000/Unit.

Kathy
x56400