![]() |
Enron Mail |
Please email me whatever version of the doc you sent to them.
When it is time for discussions meaningful discussions I would like to be involved. Thanks, Kay Fred Mitro@ECT 01/31/2001 11:17 AM To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: NRG Conference call - GE 7EA I asked Scott Maggie (NRG-CA) to see if their comments could be forwarded to us tomorrow so that we can better prepare for Friday's call. The NRG-Pittsburg personell are a commercial business person, a developer, and NRG legal. I am OK proceeding without legal on the line. I can handle the questions that come up on the transaction structure. Fred Enron North America Corp. From: Ben F Jacoby 01/31/2001 11:00 AM Sent by: Ben Jacoby To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: NRG Conference call - GE 7EA Fred: I think it's premature to have legal on the line. If they have specific comments on the docs, they need to send them to us and we can quickly get back to them. If they want to have a commercial discussion, we can proceed without legal. Thanks, Ben Fred Mitro 01/31/2001 10:28 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: NRG Conference call - GE 7EA Kay: I spoke to NRG this morning. They would like to arrange a conference call for Friday (most likely in the morning) to discuss the proposed transaction involving the GE 7EA. Are you available to call in from New York? If not, can Carolyn Campbell sit in for you on the call? Let me know sometime today. Thanks, Fred
|