Re: NRG Conference call

I agree that we don't need outside counsel on the call at this point. If I'm
available, I'm happy to participate. The scheduling problem is due to my
travel plans. I'll join in if the call is at a time I can fit in.
Otherwise, I'll catch up with you later about the results of the call.

Kay

From: Ben F Jacoby @ ECT 02/01/2001 08:32 AM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: NRG Conference call - GE 7EA

My comment was really directed toward outside counsel. As you know, you're
always welcome...

Kay Mann@ENRON
02/01/2001 06:55 AM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: NRG Conference call - GE 7EA

OK. Friday was going to be really difficult for me anyway.

Kay

From: Ben F Jacoby @ ECT 01/31/2001 11:00 AM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: NRG Conference call - GE 7EA

Fred:

I think it's premature to have legal on the line. If they have specific
comments on the docs, they need to send them to us and we can quickly get
back to them. If they want to have a commercial discussion, we can proceed
without legal.

Thanks,

Ben

Fred Mitro
01/31/2001 10:28 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: NRG Conference call - GE 7EA

Kay:

I spoke to NRG this morning. They would like to arrange a conference call
for Friday (most likely in the morning) to discuss the proposed transaction
involving the GE 7EA. Are you available to call in from New York? If not,
can Carolyn Campbell sit in for you on the call?

Let me know sometime today.

Thanks,
Fred