|
|
Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/26/2000 08:10
AM --------------------------- Ben F Jacoby@ECT 09/25/2000 07:37 PM Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Pleasanton (ENA SFO project) Lisa: I don't have a problem with this to the extent Chris Calger has approved the expenditure which I would guess would be approximately $500k. If these guys are simply trying to execute a purchase option while they try to firm up their deal, they should probably do it as a stand alone agreement (since we don't need to involve WestLB in purchase options). In any case, the key point here is Chris' approval of what is probably around a $500k expenditure (of course, the option should only be for around 10% of this amount). We don't need to worry about WestLB fees, etc., since this is an ENA (West) Originations prospective deal. Regards, Ben From: Lisa Bills @ ENRON 09/25/2000 07:16 PM To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Pleasanton (ENA SFO project) Ben, given that they want to use the existing LM6000 contract for the GSU change order, I wanted to know if you were okay with this interaction with GE. Also, by using the existing LM6000 contract, they will be using up capacity available for other LM6000 related equipment. Are you okay with this, i.e., you believe there is capacity available for them, and any suggestions on how you would like to see them pay for the usage since the LM600s have already paid the upfront structuring fee and ongoing commitment fees. Please call to discuss. Lisa ---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron on 09/25/2000 07:12 PM --------------------------- Bill Williams@ECT 09/25/2000 06:22 PM To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fillinger/SF/ECT@ECT, Dean Russell/SF/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Pleasanton (ENA SFO project) Hello Lisa I wanted to contact you to let you know that we (ENA West) are attemtping to help the ENA San Francisco guys locate a Generator Step Up Transformer for the Pleasanton project. ENA is responsible to bring an LM6000 and GSU to the project. We cannot use one of the ABB transformers (Don Hammond checked with ABB, and the as built configuration simply cannot be used or changed to meet the needs of ENA SFO's application. As such, we have had to go out and find a GSU. The good news is we have found one through GE. It will meet SFO's delivery schedule. We have not received a quote, nor have we signed anything (but we want to ASAP). In talking to Dale Rasmussen, I understand we would need to purchase this major component through a West LB structure. GE prefers to sell us the GSU through ENA's existing contract with GE. As such, I am asking what steps you (or Kay) would like us to take in setting up a purchase option (or whatever is the correct noun name for reserving, buying a needed GSU in a timely manner). This e mail is meant to be a starting point in dialog. Please contact me on Tuesday to discuss whatever is necessary. Thanks. Bill Williams ENA Portland 503-464-8958
|