Enron Mail

From:kay.mann@enron.com
To:ccampbell@kslaw.com
Subject:Re: Prototype Letter Agreement
Cc:ben.jacoby@enron.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com
Bcc:ben.jacoby@enron.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com
Date:Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:07:00 -0800 (PST)

Carolyn,

On the insurance, I would prefer that we go with set insurance requirements,
$10m in coverage (without aggregate), deductible no greater than $25,000 for
which they are responsible. We also need a Best rating of A-XIII or better.
Also, we need a specific reference to the fact that the new member will be
responsible for the insurance required in article 19.2 of the turbine
contract. The certificate of insurance should be a buyer deliverable at
closing.

Would it be better to address our ability to put the member interest to them
on or before [some date- maybe Dec 02], just to get it on the table?

Term- I'm thinking we may want to be indemnified for longer than 60 days
after commercial ops, as a claim could be brought against us for something
they did (and for which we should be indemnified) for longer than that, but
we would be out of luck, except to the extent insurance took care of it.
Maybe we should address reps/warranties separate from indemnities, with the
indemnities lasting longer.

I'd make the confidentiality agreement last for 2 years in this deal.

I'd broaden 9 (xii) to include the acquisition of the equipment, not just the
facility agreement.

14. I would reformulate 14 to negotiate around the statement that the
equipment is being acquired from ENA. I would also eliminate "or any other
third party" on the fifth line.

Defined terms: "Commercial operations" isn't in the definitions of the
turbine contract, although there may be a definition imbedded in their
somewhere (an EECC specialty). Please verify.

Do we intend to attach a form LLC agreement?

Thanks,

Kay