|
|
Enron Mail |
I just sent my comments to you and Carolyn.
Kay From: Ben F Jacoby @ ECT 01/11/2001 01:34 PM Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Prototype Letter Agreement Kay: Are you good to go? Ben Kay Mann@ENRON 01/10/2001 10:45 AM To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Prototype Letter Agreement I would like to have a chance to read it, which I haven't. I still finishing up the Intergen docs. The reason we were using a summary is that we don't know how GE is going to react, which might result in some changes to the contract. In the case of the LM's we had already agreed with GE concerning the terms applicable to the equipment after assignment. Kay From: Ben F Jacoby @ ECT 01/10/2001 10:42 AM Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: f_mitro@hotmail.com Subject: Prototype Letter Agreement Kay: Is there any reason we would attach a summary of the master 7EA facility agreement rather than a redacted copy? Other than that, it looks good to me. Are you OK with us sending this out? Also, it would be helpful to have all exhibits to send with the letter (i.e., LLC Agreement, Facility Agreement summary, escrow agreement, etc.) Please let me know the status of these. Thanks, Ben ---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 09:28 AM --------------------------- From: Suzanne Adams on 01/09/2001 02:54 PM To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Prototype Letter Agreement I'm forwarding this per Kay's request. ----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 02:53 PM ----- "Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com< on 01/08/2001 05:18:16 PM To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com< cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com< Subject: Prototype Letter Agreement <<2rz503!.DOC<< <<2RZ5RED.DOC<< <<2R6LRED.DOC<< Kay: Enclosed is a revised draft of the proposed letter agreement for the 7EA turbines reflecting Ben's business points and the matters discussed in our telephone conference earlier today. Also enclosed is a blacklined copy reflecting revisions from the December 15, 2000 draft of the prototype letter agreement. Although we have enclosed a blacklined draft reflecting revisions from the final draft of the CA/ED-I letter agreement, this is difficult to read due to our re-arrangement of the reps and warranties. If you have any questions or comments, please advise. (I have received the courier package with the GE Facility Agreements). Carolyn M. Campbell King & Spalding 713-276-7307 (phone) 713-751-3280 (fax) ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com< Enclosures: 129569v3 129569vR3/2 129569v3 R 128541v18 Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message. - 2rz503!.DOC - 2RZ5RED.DOC - 2R6LRED.DOC
|