Enron Mail

From:kay.mann@enron.com
To:stephen.thome@enron.com
Subject:Re: Turbines
Cc:ccampbell@kslaw.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com, carlos.sole@enron.com
Bcc:ccampbell@kslaw.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com, carlos.sole@enron.com
Date:Tue, 6 Mar 2001 03:44:00 -0800 (PST)

Obviously this is going complicate (and increase the cost) of the
transaction. Is there any way to push back on this? We will now need four
break out contracts, four sets of every other document, 4 sets of assigning
docs out of TurboPark, etc.... Not hard to do, but a challenge to do on your
time frame.

Kay




Stephen Thome@ECT
03/06/2001 11:39 AM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Turbines

Catherine, John,

I just received this from Panda regarding their project company structure.
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 11:31
AM ---------------------------


"Lori Holt" <LoriH@pandaenergy.com< on 03/06/2001 11:04:12 AM
To: <Stephen.thome@enron.com<
cc: "Jimmy Teringo" <JimmyT.Dallas.Panda@pandaenergy.com<
Subject: Turbines


Steve,
I was correct in my assumptions. Each turbine should go into four different
LP's. Panda West Power I, L.P., Panda West Power II, L.P., Panda West
PowerIII, L.P. and Panda West Power IV, L.P. Please advise if you have any
additional questions.
Regards,
Lori