Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000 03:34
PM --------------------------- From: Christi L Nicolay @ ECT 11/06/2000 02:29 PM To: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: VEPCO files Interconnection Proc. at FERC On 10/27/00, VEPCO filed interconnection procedures at FERC (Docket No. ER01-247)(Protests due 11/17/00). These largely mirror CP&L's interconnection procedures that were recently approved by FERC. Therefore, I do not think that Enron should protest or intervene. Customer is required to pay for the cost of a new system impact/facilities study if the study information/interconnection/upgrade costs change due to a customer higher in the queue losing its queue spot. System impact studies should take 60 days or less. Facilities studies should take 90 days or less.
|