|
|
Enron Mail |
SOOOO--Is it really too late to consider a disaster recovery site that would be safer than Ardmore in the event of flood, bio-terrorism, or other crazy attack, that would be marketable to other companies?? I think that this a question that one should ask one's self if one was just promoted to a lofty position of authority.
Dan -----Original Message----- From: Hotte, Steve Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:59 AM To: McCarty, Danny Subject: FW: business recovery question I participate in the Southern Gas Association and am asked questions as related to IT topics. If the early discussions you and I had regarding the provision of disaster recovery by ETS would have taken a different turn I could have provided an interesting answer to this one... -----Original Message----- From: Magan S Yarbrough [mailto:msyarbrough@cmsenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:40 AM To: ittalk@southerngas.org Subject: business recovery question We are doing our annual review of disaster/recovery procedures and expecting to make revisions in light of the Sept. 11 attack. Our current plans are based on the potential of a fire damaging the building or a hurricane in the region. We are interested in knowing what other options companies are planning for: the building being gone? toxic chemicals in the area causing a whole area to be evacuated? other ideas? We are also interested in any references on companies that have been a resource for helping to decide what to plan for and how to manage the risks. Thanks for your help, Magan Yarbrough IS Manager, Operations CMS Panhandle Pipe Line Companies e-mail: msyarbrough@cmsenergy.com phone: 713-989-7330 You are subscribed to the ITTalk listserv: ittalk@southerngas.org. To unsubscribe, send an email to ittalk-request@southerngas.org with only the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the message body.
|