RE: answer to cpuc protest

I think we could wind this up with a quick conference call tomorrow a.m. Greg and I had some additional thoughts on how to handle the issue that this contract is not for 40% of primary capacity - it is not like an El Paso/Dynegy, Enron or El Paso deal without necessarily getting into the alternate issue of sham transactions. Also, Kathy R. checked and as of today, IS have not filed a protest. Maria

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Mary Kay
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Pavlou, Maria; Rapp, Bill
Cc: Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven; Kirk, Steve
Subject: RE: answer to cpuc protest

Attached are some addtional comments and questions in regard to this answer. MK

<< File: RP97-288cpucmk.doc <<

-----Original Message-----
From: Pavlou, Maria
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:18 AM
To: Rapp, Bill
Cc: Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; Miller, Mary Kay; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven
Subject: answer to cpuc protest

Bill, attached are a few comments/questions on your proposed draft answer, which I thought was excellent. We might want to discuss some of these questions with the ccs. Thanks, Maria

<< File: RP97-288cpuc.doc <<