|
|
Enron Mail |
The numbers looked good for the 18th's report of numbers for the 15th. We will watch them closely for a couple of days. So far 1 for 1.
Thanks, Jon -----Original Message----- From: Reeves, Kathy Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 10:21 AM To: Pham, Binh Cc: Giron, Darron C.; Mckay, Jonathan Subject: FW: Revised BAsis numbers The basis numbers published for the 14th were quite different for three of the numbers published Sumas CashSpread: Correct basis: -.495; Basis Published: -.315 Aeco CashSpread: Correct basis: --.478; Basis Published: -.536 Sumas June Spread: Correct basis: -.45; Basis Published +.055 The Sumas June spread is WAY off. Would you be able to get the numbers fixed for the 15th publication. We have received a phone call for three days in a row now from Lavo wondering why we marked our curves so off. We have not marked our curves wrong but the report is wrong. If this schedule helps I can send it tonight as well. As I have stated before it would not be correct to get Aeco and Sumas IM numbers for ANY pubcode other that Sumas-US/IM or Aeco-Cdn/IM. The other pubcodes are not correct 100% of the time. Kathy -----Original Message----- From: Reeves, Kathy Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 10:02 PM To: Pham, Binh Subject: Revised BAsis numbers << File: Canada_BasisSpreads.xls <<
|