|
|
Enron Mail |
Grant/Dan, both Gulf and BP agree with the language. Dan please insert the clause in both contracts: Transaction #1 and #1a and then please forward updated contracts. Dan - does Enron need to sign the assignment again or acknowledge that the existing assignment agreement will suffice? Either acknowledge by replying to this e-mail or e-mail to state Enron need to sign the agreement again. Kelvin - I believe the attachment below will be the final version for BP. I would attach this document with BP's "package" to be sent to your US signing authority. I understand this is the last hurdle in making the assignment work, so lets endeavor to have all the agreements signed by Tuesday afternoon so we can start flowing AOS on Wednesday for Thursday's nomination cycle. Thanks everyone, ------ Bruce Kohrs Phone: (403)205-7684 Fax: (403)266-1947 e-mail:bruce_kohrs@keyspancanada.com Grant.Oh@enro n.com To: bruce_kohrs@keyspancanada.com cc: 04/06/2001 Subject: Crestar/BP 03:07 PM here we are bruce.... ---------------------- Forwarded by Grant Oh/CAL/ECT on 04/06/2001 04:05 PM --------------------------- Dan J Hyvl 04/06/2001 01:04 PM To: Grant Oh/CAL/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Crestar/BP Please review the new added language to see if this is what you have agreed to do. (See attached file: 2001-023acrfm.doc) (See attached file: 2001-023acrfm.doc) - 2001-023acrfm.doc
|