|
|
Enron Mail |
when are we going to gather up and discuss?
---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Quick/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 01:17 PM --------------------------- From: Mark Whitt@ENRON on 10/03/2000 12:03 PM MDT Sent by: Mark Whitt@ENRON To: Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, kcrisa@apex2000.net, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Staab/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Crescendo Noms into NWPL I spoke with Kent Harris at Wildhorse today and he stated there position to me on a few things. 1. Our Interruptible noms to NWPL for Wed. were not cut due to contractual reasons, we were cut due to a lack of capacity. He said that the San Arroyo #2 compressor was down and without it they cannot make additional deliveries to NWPL. They hope to have it up by friday and will try to provide us some capacity into NWPL. 2. Kent reiterated their position regarding our contract by stating that "the intent of the original contract was not to take gas through other systems other than the Mesa system". In addition he stated that we do not have the right to choose which pipeline our gas is delivered to. 3. He also asked whether or not we were willing to negotiate on the current situation or if we wanted to let the 'lawyers fight it out". I reiterated that we have been waiting for them to either acknowledge that they will gather the entrada gas under the current contract or provide us with another alternative. Absent either of those 2 things happening all we can do is try to live by the existing agreement. He stated that they have new estimates on the cost to construct a new line through the South Canyon and it is approximately $1MM less than their original esitmate. We left it that he would determine whether or not they would gather the Entrada under the existing contract or make a new proposal that would most likely wrap the Entrada and Dakota up under one new deal and replace the existing contract. I told him we would determine whether or not we wanted to "let the lawyers fight over the existing contract" or work on a new deal for all the production. P.S. They are still very interested in some type of Joint Venture. Mark ----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 10/03/2000 11:07 AM ----- Theresa Staab 10/03/2000 09:21 AM To: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Nicole Cortez/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacqueline P Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey J Brewer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Crescendo Noms into NWPL Liz Orr with Wildhorse just called to inform me we cannot nominate into NWPL. Her legal department has informed her there are issues with the contract and until they inform her otherwise, our gas can only flow into Questar. Physically, we can flow into NWPL but contractully we cannot. We have changed the nominations back to Questar for tomorrow's gas day. Sorry about that, (we tried) Theresa
|