|
|
Enron Mail |
Agree. Would you please draft the letter? Thank you. Also, I haven't
heard from Wildhorse or Tom Brown today as to when the deal will close. Hope it occurred today. Ken Krisa -----Original Message----- From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 4:20 PM To: kckrisa@apex2000.net Cc: Joan.Quick@enron.com; Mark.Whitt@enron.com Subject: RE: November Nominations Ken, Our position has been that Wildhorse doesn't have the right to curtail our volumes since we have a first que position. We could draft the letter such that we demand to send 100% of our gas to NWPL. In the event that Wildhorse would only accept noms. 50% (or some portion) of this gas to NWPL, we would nominate the remainder to Questar to mitigate Wildhorse's damages. Once they accept the nom to NWPL, they have a first que obligation to move it there. From a practical standpoint, if Wildhorse curtailed us to NWPL (to our protest) after they had accepted our noms., I understand this would cause problems. However, if we nominate gas to Questar when Wildhorse is willing to accept a nom to NWPL, we would potentially be waiving damages there. "Ken" <kckrisa@apex To: <Joan.Quick@enron.com< 2000.net< cc: "Gerald R. Nemec \(E-mail\)" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com< Subject: RE: November Nominations 10/23/2000 02:37 PM Please respond to kckrisa Joan, Gerald: I am wondering whether we need to send another letter as we did for the October Nominations - to continue to show our intent to nominate 100% of gas to NWPL. I think this may take some more thought - as I don't want to be given the nomination and then curtailed 50% as other producers are. Ken -----Original Message----- From: Joan.Quick@enron.com [mailto:Joan.Quick@enron.com] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 1:21 PM To: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com Cc: kckrisa@apex2000.net; Mark.Whitt@enron.com Subject: Re: November Nominations The noms can only be done via the internet if we have a Wildhorse/NWPL transport contract number. And as far as I know, they still will not give us one. So, we can either : 1) obtain the Wildhorse/NWPL transport contract number from Tom Brown and nom via the internet to NWPL; 2) if not, nom via internet into Questar and fax letter; or 3) fax nom to Questar, along with letter. Mark - what do you think our chances of getting a Wildhorse/NWPL transport contract number are? joan To: <kckrisa@apex2000.net< cc: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: November Nominations (Document link: Joan Quick) We should again nominate to NWPL . In our nomination we can state that if Wildhorse again wrongfully rejects our nom to NWPL, we then nominate to Questar solely to mitigate damages. I can draft the appropriate letter. Joan or Ken, Will the nominations be done via the web site? Do we have the information to nominate to NWPL via the website? "Ken" <kckrisa@apex To: 2000.net< cc: Subject: 10/23/2000 08:57 AM Please respond to kckrisa Joan, Gerald; What is the game plan for November nominations? Do we want to go through the same deal as before and nominate on NWPL, get rejected, and renominate on Questar? Or, do we want to nominate on Questar and include a statement that we are nominating on Questar only because of last month's ordeal? Tom Brown and Wildhorse are supposed to close today - if they didn't get their late last Friday. Ken Krisa
|