Enron Mail |
Bo thanks for the info. I will review later. At first glance it looks like
they didn't take too much out. Please note their Exhibit A is wrong. Either ENA or Enron Compression Services is the Company (or Customer whichever case) and EES should be one or the other. Maybe we can get together tomorrow or Thursday, whichever fits your schedule. Christy To: Bo Barnwell/HOU/EES@EES cc: Andrew Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Christina Finelli/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Gas Agreement Bo, Attached is the draft of the gas agreement for the StageCoach transaction. There are still a few blanks for which Andrew is getting the information. Please review and let me know if you have any questions. Also to follow up on our discussion from earlier concerning who would actually contracts with the PPL for the Utility Agreement; we had earlier discussed Tennessee Gas Pipeline contracting with the Utility with EES acting as their agent for interaction with the Utility. However, I think it should be EES who contracts with the Utility to receive electric service. TGP has contracted with ECS for Compression Services and ECS has contracted with EES for power. TGP has no need for a power deal. Let me know what you think about this. It is my understanding that EES is working on a revised draft of the TA for the Power Contract. Let me know if this is not correct. Thanks.
|