Enron Mail

From:christina.finelli@enron.com
To:gerald.nemec@enron.com
Subject:Re: Gas Agreement
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 20 Mar 2001 02:23:00 -0800 (PST)

Bo thanks for the info. I will review later. At first glance it looks like
they didn't take too much out. Please note their Exhibit A is wrong. Either
ENA or Enron Compression Services is the Company (or Customer whichever case)
and EES should be one or the other.

Maybe we can get together tomorrow or Thursday, whichever fits your schedule.

Christy


To: Bo Barnwell/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Andrew Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Christina Finelli/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Gas Agreement

Bo, Attached is the draft of the gas agreement for the StageCoach
transaction. There are still a few blanks for which Andrew is getting the
information. Please review and let me know if you have any questions.



Also to follow up on our discussion from earlier concerning who would
actually contracts with the PPL for the Utility Agreement; we had earlier
discussed Tennessee Gas Pipeline contracting with the Utility with EES acting
as their agent for interaction with the Utility. However, I think it should
be EES who contracts with the Utility to receive electric service. TGP has
contracted with ECS for Compression Services and ECS has contracted with EES
for power. TGP has no need for a power deal. Let me know what you think
about this.

It is my understanding that EES is working on a revised draft of the TA for
the Power Contract. Let me know if this is not correct. Thanks.