|
|
Enron Mail |
Ran this by Mike Grigsby. His last recollection is that we never agreed to
include the San Juan basin for the purpose of this valuation. Can you please advise.? If San Juan is included, non-bondad is the correct reference. The adjustment for the potential reallocation is okay. I am at x31688. thanks Stephanie Gerald Nemec@ECT 04/19/2001 01:54 PM To: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: LETTER OF UNDERSTANDINDG ----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 01:54 PM ----- "Meier, Peter" <peter.meier@neg.pge.com< 04/19/2001 12:50 PM To: "'gerald.nemec@enron.com'" <gerald.nemec@enron.com<, "'steve.van.hooser@enron.com'" <steve.van.hooser@enron.com<, "'lisa.mellencamp@enron.com'" <lisa.mellencamp@enron.com< cc: "Barron, Bob" <bob.barron@neg.pge.com< Subject: LETTER OF UNDERSTANDINDG <<PGESpreadvaluationdefinition 4-19.doc<< I went ahead and made the conforming changes I thought needed to be made to the Spread Calculation and have one question identified. Please review and sign off so that we can attach to execution document. Peter PG&E National Energy Group and any other company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither PG&E National Energy Group nor these other referenced companies are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company do not have to buy products from these companies in order to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility. - PGESpreadvaluationdefinition 4-19.doc
|