Enron Mail

From:steve.hooser@enron.com
To:gerald.nemec@enron.com
Subject:Re: Platform Lease -Reply
Cc:barbara.gray@enron.com
Bcc:barbara.gray@enron.com
Date:Thu, 1 Jun 2000 01:52:00 -0700 (PDT)

Gerald,

Excellent work!! The legal reasoning, advocacy and tone are first rate. I
will be interested to hear how Brad (or more importantly, his lawyer) respond
to this message. I would suggest that you forward a copy of this to Ted
Bland, Chris Lindsey @ Mariner and Burlington's lawyer, whose name escapes me
at the moment--Ted will remember and may have e:mail addresses. Thanks for
handling so we.

Steve



Gerald Nemec
05/31/2000 01:04 PM

To: "Bradley G Penn" <bgpenn@marathonoil.com<@ENRON
cc: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Platform Lease -Reply

I have reviewed your response and disagree with the characterization of our
modification the documents. I would like to clarify our reasons for the
modifications to avoid any further miscommunications.

MEGS' alteration of the documents do not impair the protections afforded to
Marathon under the Production Handling Agreement. Our modifications were
simply intended to allocate certain risks between MEGS and Mariner with
respect to Marathon (as operator of the South Pass 89 B Platform) as such
risks were intended to be allocated by MEGS and Mariner. Mariner's transfer
of interest in the flowline to MEGS introduces a new party which Marathon can
look to for certain obligations with respect to the platform. The
alterations do not remove Mariner from its current role as operator and
maintainer of the flowline and owner of the hydrocarbons. For these reasons,
I would disagree with your response that the draft alterations do not provide
the intended protections that Marathon would expect absent such a transfer to
MEGS. Mariner still shoulders these risks and expenses under the Production
Handling Agreement.

Having MEGS fully ratify the Production Handling Agreement and becoming
jointly and severally liable to Marathon is not appropriate. MEGS does not
hold title to any hydrocarbon production or operate the facilities and should
not be liable for all risks and expenses associated therewith. Mariner
should continue to shoulder those risks and as before.

I would be happy to discuss your issues with our Platform Lease revisions at
your convenience or to discuss the above further.





"Bradley G Penn" <bgpenn@marathonoil.com<
05/26/2000 10:00 AM

To: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
cc: ERGetz@GROUPWISE.MarathonOil.com, JCAlbert@GROUPWISE.MarathonOil.com
Subject: Platform Lease -Reply


Attached are our response and ratification agreement.
BGP

<<< "Gerald Nemec" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com< 05/25/00 04:49pm <<<


Brad, Can you give me a status on where you are at with the review of the
Lease
Docs for the MEGS Facilities? I forward those documents about a month back.

Gerald Nemec
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
- MEGS.DOC
- MEGSRAT.DOC