Enron Mail

From:gerald.nemec@enron.com
To:colleen.sullivan@enron.com
Subject:Re: New Product--Suggested Language Changes
Cc:carlos.alatorre@enron.com, carl.carter@enron.com
Bcc:carlos.alatorre@enron.com, carl.carter@enron.com
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:44:00 -0800 (PST)

I will remove the open season reference. Some pipeline tariffs do refer to
open season for capacity release, but it may cause confusion so probably to
remove it.

The terms you referenced are defined in the product description. The EOL
access agreement makes it clear that the product description is binding on
the counterparty.




Colleen Sullivan
11/06/2000 12:42 PM

To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron, Carl
Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Product--Suggested Language Changes

Last week I sent copies of the product description and GTC to Becky Cantrell
(regulatory) for comments and she did make a couple of suggestions which I
agree with. First, in both the description and the original GTC we refer to
an open season; however, this product is for capacity release, which would
not be subject to an open season--only bidding. So, Gerald, unless you have
some objection that we have overlooked, I believe it is appropriate to remove
the words "or open season" in the product description. Regarding the GTC,
since we were planning on eliminating Paragraph 3 anyway, which had the open
season reference, I think that one is already taken care of.

The other question she had is how we would define the following terms and how
they would be made a part of the contract: Reference Pipeline, Rate
Schedule, Primary Receipt and Delivery Point. Please let me know your
thoughts on this.