|
|
Enron Mail |
I reviewed the draft you forwarded. Looks good. I have the following two
questions: Section 1.1 - The fourth sentence down in the parenthesis "(whether owned or leased by LESSEE)". Shouldn't that read "(whether owned, operated, or leased by LESSEE)" since Mariner only operates the Property for MEGS? Term - Shouldn't the term mirror the term for the Production Handling Agreement? Section 7.1.2.e allows termination after January 1, 2005. Why would Marathon want to terminate while the PHA is still in effect? "Bradley G Penn" <BGPenn@MarathonOil.com< 06/14/2000 09:16 AM To: lvickers@br-inc.com, Gerald.Nemec@enron.com, jdegraffenreid@hess.com, gharless@mariner-energy.com cc: ERGetz@MarathonOil.com, JCAlbert@MarathonOil.com, RAHernandez@MarathonOil.com, RJColosimo@MarathonOil.com Subject: South Pass 89 B Lease of Platform Space Attached is a revised Lease of Platform Space Agreement (LOPSA) for the MEGS property associated with the Mariner Pluto subsea development. This version has Mariner as operator on behalf of MEGS, L.L.C. as Lessee. The responsible party will be Mariner for performance and notification. The obligations between Mariner and MEGS are covered in their separate agreement for O&M. Please review and let me know if you have suggested changes. I will not be able to access my e-mail between June 21 and June 29. Hopefully on June 29 we will be in our new offices in Houston and ready to go. Thanks, BGP - Megslops.doc
|