Enron Mail

From:susan.pereira@enron.com
To:leslie.robinson@enron.com
Subject:Re: ProEnergy/Cinergy imbalance on LRC
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 05:32:00 -0800 (PST)

The only info I had from you is that we owed ProEnergy 11,035 mmbtu. I asked
you if we had any other outstanding imbalances with Cinergy or its
precursors. You gave me the Onyx volume, but I had already negotiated the
deal. Whose imbalance is the 10,644 mmbtu??

Susan Pereira





Leslie Robinson@ENRON
11/10/2000 11:34 AM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ProEnergy/Cinergy imbalance on LRC


Daniel Kieran with Cinergy/Producer's Energy called me because he wanted
clarification on something in the contract. He thinks were forgetting about
the imbalance due LRP of 10,644. I thought you said the reason the price was
so low was because that imbalance had been taken into consideration, so in a
sense we are netting the two. Is this correct? Also, was the Oryx imbalance
of (770) taken into consideration in the agreement below?



Susan W Pereira@ECT
10/20/2000 03:15 PM
To: Leslie Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ProEnergy/Cinergy imbalance on LRC


Cinergy has agreed to settle the imbalance of 11,035 mmbtu owed them at
$1.77/mmbtu. Please prepare the paperwork showing us paying them $19,531.95
to clear this imbalance.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira

p.s.- you can just address the letter to Daniel Kieran