Enron Mail

From:m..presto@enron.com
To:rogers.herndon@enron.com
Subject:FW: Potential POLR Opportunity
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:52:31 -0700 (PDT)

What is this?

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Migden, Janine =20
Sent:=09Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:54 PM
To:=09Presto, Kevin M.; Ader, Jeff; Allegretti, Daniel; Baughman, Edward D.=
; Bernstein, Mark; Boston, Roy; Burrows, John; Clynes, Terri; Courtney, Mar=
k; Decker, Charles; Detina, Ken; Frazier, J Ryan; Gahn, Scott; Hueter, Barb=
ara A.; Kingerski, Harry; Landwehr, Susan M.; Letke, Eric; Lewis, James; Ma=
strangelo, Lino; Merola, Jeff; Migden, Janine; Nicolay, Christi; Persson, R=
oger; Roan, Michael; Sewell, Doug; Shapiro, Richard; Sharfman, Guy; Sharp, =
Greg; Snyder, Brad; Steffes, James D.; Stoness, Scott; Ulrich, Marc; Whalan=
, Jubran; Wood, James; Young, Ress
Subject:=09FW: Potential POLR Opportunity

FYI..
According to Marc, the residential load is 8202 MW and the average rate is =
$.093/kwh. - see below.
Thanks Marc!

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Ulrich, Marc =20
Sent:=09Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:22 AM
To:=09Migden, Janine
Cc:=09Sharfman, Guy
Subject:=09Re: Potential POLR Opportunity


=20



From:=09Janine Migden/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/25/2001 09:49 AM
To:=09Kevin M Presto/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Daniel Allegr=
etti/ENRON@enronXgate, Edward D Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Bernstein/H=
OU/EES@EES, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, John D Burrows/HOU/EES@EES, Terri Clyne=
s/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Courtney/HOU/EES@EES, Charles Decker/HOU/EES@EES, =
Ken Detina/HOU/EES@EES, J Ryan Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES,=
Barbara A Hueter/ENRON@enronXgate, Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan=
M Landwehr/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES=
@EES, Lino Mastrangelo/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Merola/HOU/EES@EES, Janine Migden/=
ENRON@enronXgate, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Persson/HOU/EES@EES,=
Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug Sewell/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Shapiro/=
ENRON@enronXgate, Guy Sharfman/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Brad J =
Snyder/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES=
@EES, Marc Ulrich/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, James B Wood/EWC/=
Enron@ENRON, Ress Young/HOU/EES@EES
cc:=09=20
Subject:=09Potential POLR Opportunity

Rob Kelter and Julie Lucas from Citizen's Utility Board (CUB) a residential=
advocacy group in Illinois called me yesterday to discuss Enron's interest=
in becoming a provider of last resort for Illinois residential customers s=
erved by ComEd. As a result of the letter that ComEd sent to the ICC regar=
ding the PPO, etc, CUB has met with ComEd regarding the impact on residenti=
al customers. ComEd has told CUB that they do not want to be the provider =
of last resort and also that their plan is to raise the residential rate hi=
gh enough to incentivize marketers to come and serve, a plan which is anath=
ema to CUB.

The bottom line is that CUB is either looking to pass legislation for munic=
ipal aggregation like Ohio or work out a deal with a supplier to be the POL=
R and take it to ComEd. (While I don't know this for sure, I suspect we ar=
e the only marketer they have talked to since we were the only ones to expr=
ess an interest in talking further). If that doesn't work, they want to fo=
rce ComEd into doing least cost planning for its supply.

Rob did not know what the unbundled generation rate is but said the all-in =
rate is approximately $.09/kwh. Subtracting out t&d we could be looking at=
a generation price to beat of approximately $.06/kwh. We would also need t=
o factor in the impact of any increase as a result of the DST case because =
under their filing, the rate increase applies only to customers who switch.=
As part of any deal, we could argue to ComEd that the customers we take o=
n should be treated like bundled customers). I have asked Marc Ulrich and =
Guy Sharfman for specifics as to the size of the residential load and the u=
nbundled generation rate.

The questions we need to discuss internally include:

1. Is this a deal we could do from a physical delivery standpoint?
2. If yes, would we want to take on the entire residential load or just a =
portion, for example the residential customers of the City of Chicago).
3. Is this an EES deal or is this an ENA deal in which we bring in New Pow=
er? =20

Your comments and thoughts would be appreciated. At any rate this will be =
on the agenda for our ComEd strategy meeting on August 6 - see other emails=
. Rob and I agreed to get back in touch the week of August 19th to discuss=
further.

Janine