|
|
Enron Mail |
i got a call from jody's alleged partner last night...he's out and feels
guilty so since he is a manager at sherlock's....free 1st round when we decide to visit....cheap bastard! so am i jody's partner and do we have a 14th team???? i'm not sure who's more pathetic....me giving up a hawaiian vacation 2 years ago so i could partake....or grant taking time from work and flying in from alaska to be part of the houston ffl? gamblers rule! now if we could only entice jody to bring aboard his wife....all would be right. ty.servello@cs.oag.state.tx.us <<< "Smith, Jeff" <Jeff_Smith@AFCC.com< 09/06/01 10:44AM <<< That idea is the best I've heard so far. And this thing about not voting this year is crap because if enough people have issues about something it should be voted on for this year. It's not like it would be a major problem to implement such a system for this year as you've already said we'll come with two systems on Saturday. This is what email is for - why can't we have a vote on email between today and tomorrow and have a decision before Saturday. < -----Original Message----- < From: Dutch.Quigley@enron.com [SMTP:Dutch.Quigley@enron.com] < Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:33 AM < To: Smith, Jeff; Chris.Kiske@arbitron.com; klyn@pdq.net; < Ty.Servello@OAG.STATE.TX.US; michael.deluke@us.pwcglobal.com; < mcurrie@tcta.org; Jerry.Spottswood@COMPAQ.com; jeffu192@cs.com; < johnsogc@bp.com; DG_SKI@email.msn.com; ckiske@austin.rr.com; < b_sting91@excite.com; Andy_Reynolds@panda-law.com < Subject: RE: Franchise Players and the Draft < < suggested draft order: < < scenario < 5 franchise teams and 7 non-franchise < franchise teams ranked 1 - 5 based on total points of franchise player < from < previous year < < First the supplemental draft < < Round one < # 5 franchise team, # 7 supplemental , # 4 franchise , # 6 supplemental < and < so forth and so on < < with a non snake system going from there < < ok everyone chew on that and spit back < < Dutch < < < -----Original Message----- < From: "Smith, Jeff" <Jeff_Smith@AFCC.com<@ENRON < < [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Smith+2C+20Jeff+22+20+3CJeff+5FSmith+40AFCC+2Ecom+3E < +40ENRON@ENRON.com] < < < Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:44 AM < To: 'Kiske, Chris'; 'Kevin'; Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael < Currie; Jody Spottswood; Jeff Ullrich; Grant Johnson; < Quigley, < Dutch; Dan Wienserski; Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy < Reynolds < Subject: RE: Franchise Players and the Draft < < The snake thing is good and bad. But I think the first round should < be < randomly selected for ALL teams because the current way gives those not < keeping a franchise player a double benefit by picking in the < supplemental < and then also at the top of the first round. Theoretically the non < keeper < teams are getting the 8-14 best players who are arguably also franchise < players. In effect by not keeping a player you are randomly selecting < a < lower level franchise player. So they shouldn't get the an automatic < shot < at 15-22 or whatever it might be as well. So snake or no snake all of < round < one should be random order. < < < -----Original Message----- < < From: Kiske, Chris [SMTP:Chris.Kiske@arbitron.com] < < Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:59 PM < < To: 'Kevin'; Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael Currie; Jody < Spottswood; < < Jeff Ullrich; Smith, Jeff; Grant Johnson; Dutch Quigley; Dan < Wienserski; < < Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds; Kiske, Chris < < Subject: RE: Franchise Players and the Draft < < < < As the creator of the algebraic mean sequenced draft order that was < built < < to eliminate the inherent advantage that the #1 & #14 teams had by < getting < < back to back picks every other round, I think the time for < mathematical < < preciseness has passed. I'm all for going to a simplified < traditional < < snake system. Frankly, at this point I think there are as many < < disadvantages to being 1 or 14 (or 2 - 13) as advantages that it all < works < < itself out. Hell, if it makes preparing for the draft any easier (or < < administering the league), I'm for it! < < < < PS - I'm for keeping TE's too! < < < < (Somewhere, Rick is rolling over in his grave) < < < < < < -----Original Message----- < < From: Kevin [mailto:klyn@pdq.net] < < Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:53 PM < < To: Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael Currie; Jody Spottswood; < Jeff < < Ullrich; Jeff Smith (E-mail); Grant Johnson; Dutch Quigley; Dan < < Wienserski; Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds; Chris Kiske < < (Work) < < Subject: Franchise Players and the Draft < < < < < < The following is the list of franchise players that have been < kept: < < < < Grant Johnson - Eddie George < < Jeff Smith - Peyton Manning < < Michael Deluke - Marshall Faulk < < Michael Currie - Edgerrian James < < Jeff Ullrich - Kurt Warner < < < < I know this was brought up last year and we kind of decided < much < of < < nothing...but does anyone object to going to a snake system for the < draft. < < 1-14, 14-1 for the whole draft? We will still have a supplemental < round < < for those that do not keep franchise players. Then the non-franchise < < teams will pick in opposite order of the supplemental round for round < < one...thus if you pick first in the supplemental round, you will pick < last < < (for those that did not keep franchise players) in the first round. < Then, < < the teams that kept franchise players will be randomly selected to < pick at < < the end of the first round. After the first round, the draft will < snake < < back the other way with the last pick in the first round getting the < first < < pick in the second round and the draft will continue in this snake < order < < until the end of the draft. Let me know what you think or if you are < < confused. < < < < See everyone at the draft!!! < < < < Kevin < < < <h< and then also at the top of th < < < < ********************************************************************** < This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate < and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of < the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by < others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or < authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or < reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and < delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) < are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or < evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of < its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not < be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or < otherwise. Thank you. < **********************************************************************
|