Enron Mail

From:jeff_smith@afcc.com
To:'kevin'@enron.com, chris'.'kiske@enron.com, servello.ty@enron.com,deluke.mike@enron.com, currie.michael@enron.com, spottswood.jody@enron.com, ullrich.jeff@enron.com, johnson.grant@enron.com, dutch.quigley@enron.com, wienserski.dan@enron.com, home <.
Subject:RE: Franchise Players and the Draft
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:00:25 -0700 (PDT)

Dutch's suggestion would alleviate all of Kevin's points below. Whether we
snake after that is another issue - the top three rounds are more important
than the back to back pick issue.

< -----Original Message-----
< From: Kevin [SMTP:klyn@pdq.net]
< Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:09 AM
< To: Smith, Jeff; 'Kiske, Chris'; Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael
< Currie; Jody Spottswood; Jeff Ullrich; Grant Johnson; Dutch Quigley; Dan
< Wienserski; Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds
< Subject: Re: Franchise Players and the Draft
<
< Actually the draft order was determined by a vote and is not subject to
< change...this year anyway. The idea behind it was to not let someone keep
< a
< franchise player (generally one of the top 5 players overall) and then
< receive possibly the fifteenth pick overall in the draft...thus getting a
< top 5 player and the number one pick in the next round, while someone that
< does not keep a franchise player in theory could get the last pick of the
< supplemental round and the last pick of the first round (number 14 player
< and the 28th player)...too much of a penalty to one team. Of course this
< is
< all subject to vote and can be changed for next year.
<
< Kevin
<
< ----- Original Message -----
< From: "Smith, Jeff" <Jeff_Smith@AFCC.com<
< To: "'Kiske, Chris'" <Chris.Kiske@arbitron.com<; "'Kevin'" <klyn@pdq.net<;
< "Ty Servello" <Ty.Servello@OAG.STATE.TX.US<; "Mike Deluke"
< <michael.deluke@us.pwcglobal.com<; "Michael Currie" <mcurrie@tcta.org<;
< "Jody Spottswood" <Jerry.Spottswood@COMPAQ.com<; "Jeff Ullrich"
< <jeffu192@cs.com<; "Grant Johnson" <johnsogc@bp.com<; "Dutch Quigley"
< <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com<; "Dan Wienserski" <DG_SKI@email.msn.com<; "Chris
< Kiske (Home)" <ckiske@austin.rr.com<; "BJ Naman" <b_sting91@excite.com<;
< "Andy Reynolds" <Andy_Reynolds@panda-law.com<
< Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:43 AM
< Subject: RE: Franchise Players and the Draft
<
<
< < The snake thing is good and bad. But I think the first round should be
< < randomly selected for ALL teams because the current way gives those not
< < keeping a franchise player a double benefit by picking in the
< supplemental
< < and then also at the top of the first round. Theoretically the non
< keeper
< < teams are getting the 8-14 best players who are arguably also franchise
< < players. In effect by not keeping a player you are randomly selecting a
< < lower level franchise player. So they shouldn't get the an automatic
< shot
< < at 15-22 or whatever it might be as well. So snake or no snake all of
< round
< < one should be random order.
< <
< < < -----Original Message-----
< < < From: Kiske, Chris [SMTP:Chris.Kiske@arbitron.com]
< < < Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:59 PM
< < < To: 'Kevin'; Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael Currie; Jody
< Spottswood;
< < < Jeff Ullrich; Smith, Jeff; Grant Johnson; Dutch Quigley; Dan
< Wienserski;
< < < Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds; Kiske, Chris
< < < Subject: RE: Franchise Players and the Draft
< < <
< < < As the creator of the algebraic mean sequenced draft order that was
< built
< < < to eliminate the inherent advantage that the #1 & #14 teams had by
< getting
< < < back to back picks every other round, I think the time for
< mathematical
< < < preciseness has passed. I'm all for going to a simplified traditional
< < < snake system. Frankly, at this point I think there are as many
< < < disadvantages to being 1 or 14 (or 2 - 13) as advantages that it all
< works
< < < itself out. Hell, if it makes preparing for the draft any easier (or
< < < administering the league), I'm for it!
< < <
< < < PS - I'm for keeping TE's too!
< < <
< < < (Somewhere, Rick is rolling over in his grave)
< < <
< < <
< < < -----Original Message-----
< < < From: Kevin [mailto:klyn@pdq.net]
< < < Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:53 PM
< < < To: Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael Currie; Jody Spottswood; Jeff
< < < Ullrich; Jeff Smith (E-mail); Grant Johnson; Dutch Quigley; Dan
< < < Wienserski; Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds; Chris Kiske
< < < (Work)
< < < Subject: Franchise Players and the Draft
< < <
< < <
< < < The following is the list of franchise players that have been kept:
< < <
< < < Grant Johnson - Eddie George
< < < Jeff Smith - Peyton Manning
< < < Michael Deluke - Marshall Faulk
< < < Michael Currie - Edgerrian James
< < < Jeff Ullrich - Kurt Warner
< < <
< < < I know this was brought up last year and we kind of decided much of
< < < nothing...but does anyone object to going to a snake system for the
< draft.
< < < 1-14, 14-1 for the whole draft? We will still have a supplemental
< round
< < < for those that do not keep franchise players. Then the non-franchise
< < < teams will pick in opposite order of the supplemental round for round
< < < one...thus if you pick first in the supplemental round, you will pick
< last
< < < (for those that did not keep franchise players) in the first round.
< Then,
< < < the teams that kept franchise players will be randomly selected to
< pick
< at
< < < the end of the first round. After the first round, the draft will
< snake
< < < back the other way with the last pick in the first round getting the
< first
< < < pick in the second round and the draft will continue in this snake
< order
< < < until the end of the draft. Let me know what you think or if you are
< < < confused.
< < <
< < < See everyone at the draft!!!
< < <
< < < Kevin
< < <
< < <