|
|
Enron Mail |
Cc: bill.rapp@enron.com, glen.hass@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: bill.rapp@enron.com, glen.hass@enron.com X-From: Pryor, Tony </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TPRYOR< X-To: Fossum, Drew </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dfossum<, Harris, Steven </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sharris1< X-cc: Rapp, Bill </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Brapp<, Hass, Glen </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ghass< X-bcc: X-Folder: \Bill_Rapp_Jan2002\Rapp, Bill\Inbox X-Origin: Rapp-B X-FileName: brapp (Non-Privileged).pst Drew, I'll check with Glen and Bill, who are closer to this case than I am.................Tony -----Original Message----- From: Fossum, Drew Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:10 PM To: Harris, Steven; Pryor, Tony Subject: FW: Draft Motion to Strike Embedded Cost Testimony--Solicitation of Interest are we still interested in paying these guys to fight this case, given the recent events? they may be running up a big bill. df -----Original Message----- From: Gregory Klatt [mailto:gregoryklatt@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:33 AM To: Hass, Glen; Harris, Steven; Pryor, Tony; Fossum, Drew Cc: Dan Douglass Subject: FW: Draft Motion to Strike Embedded Cost Testimony--Solicitation of Interest Here's EGA's draft motion to strike SoCalGas' and SDG&E's embedded cost studies. If possible, let's talk about same Friday afternoon. How about 3:00 p.m. Texas time? If that's okay, I'll set up the call. ----- Original Message ----- From: BCragg <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com< To: eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com<; jleslie@luce.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com<; jbushee@sablaw.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com<; tomb@crossborderenergy.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com<; salleyoo@dwt.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com<; gregoryklatt@earthlink.net <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com<; ncpederson@jonesday.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com<; ek@a-klaw.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com<; jkarp@whitecase.com <mailto:BCragg@GMSSR.com< Sent: 11/29/2001 6:38:19 PM Subject: Draft Motion to Strike Embedded Cost Testimony--Solicitation of Interest Attached for your consideration is a draft motion to stike testimony related to the embedded cost proposal in the SoCalGas/SDG&E BCAP. I have drafted this motion for EGA, but we would prefer to present it as part of a larger group. I have sent you this draft because you seem to represent parties who might have similar concerns about the embedded cost proposal. Would your clients be interested in co-sponsoring this motion? If so, please let me know as soon as possible. Ideally, we would have a loose group identified as the Moving Parties or something similar to sponsor the motion. I've dated the motion for Monday, because I think it would be most effective if the motion is public when we discuss the schedule at Tuesday's prehearing conference. I would also appreciate any comments, edits, additions, or suggestions you may have. For example, we could use some more examples of other uses of marginal costs in gas regulation. Note that the wonders of Word's footnoting function make this a little difficult to read on the screen. If you're interested in joining in this motion, please let me know no later than 10 a.m. Monday, December 3, and earlier is better. Please keep this draft confidential for now. Thanks, Brian << --- Gregory Klatt --- Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass --- gregoryklatt@earthlink.net <mailto:gregoryklatt@earthlink.net<
|