|
|
Enron Mail |
Robin,
I took a look at the intra-cand-west-phy calc and there is nothing about the calc that is different from yesterday (which Kam set up). I took a look at the detail but it is very difficult to use because if does not tie into the summary page at all. I did note the following things though: You are not pulling in our CGPR-Aeco/Basis Positions into the summary (a quick look at Aug/Sept/of Oct will show this) July will NEVER tie out until systems is able to roll off 1/30th of the MI positions daily. This applies to physical, gas daily and Financial. Please continue to use the positions we send you until we are able to tie Kathy Kathy Robin Rodrigue 06/21/2000 07:50 PM To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jeff Sears/CAL/ECT@ECT, Brian Kristjansen/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: INTRA-CAND-WEST-PHY BOOK Hey Guys, We are still not pulling the Intra-Cand-West-Phy book into the benchmark. I have talked to the systems administrator and he thinks it might be in how the book is set up in the system. I have attached below a copy of the screen that shows how we have desigated the various codes for this book. Please look at this and verify that we have it set up properly. If you have any questions feel free to give me a call. I am also attaching the detail that I pulled out of the GRMS system. Please take a look at it and help me identify what is causing our variances. For instance I am pulling a position of (245) contracts for July Price and you show a position of long 241 contracts. Thanks, Robin 713-345-7478 ---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 07:32 PM --------------------------- Gary Stadler 06/21/2000 05:09 PM To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject:
|