|
|
Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
05:02 PM --------------------------- "Jane Kravcik Murphy" <jkmurphy@JonesDay.com< on 10/25/2000 04:17:49 PM To: benjamin.rogers@enron.com, ron.coker@enron.com cc: tirwin@alleghenyenergy.com, jhammer@alleghenyenergy.com, jlapcev@alleghenyenergy.com, "William F Henze" <wfhenze@JonesDay.com<, "Michael F. Dolan" <mfdolan@JonesDay.com<, "Michael C. Gibbs" <mgibbs@JonesDay.com< Subject: Allegheny Environmental Schedule Questions _______________________________________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _______________________________________________________________ The following questions were raised by our review of the draft environmental schedules on Dealbench. LV Cogen I and II 1. Schedule 4.1(i) references an annual audit of the CEM system in May 2000. Is this audit on Dealbench and/or can we get a copy of it? 2. Please provide a copy and/or reference to a Dealbench document for the Phase I referenced on Schedule 4.1(n). 3. Please provide copies and/or references to Dealbench documents for the items listed as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 on Schedule 4.1(u). [Note that we have reviewed the 1995 storm water permit, but did not see an indication that it is automatically renewed. Is this reflected elsewhere?] Wheatland, Gleason and Lincoln 1. We noticed that Schedule 4.1(u) for each facility indicates that an SPCC is needed but not currently in place. What is stored that triggers the SPCC requirement? How long have these materials been stored at the facilities? Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss these issues in further detail. Thanks.
|