![]() |
Enron Mail |
Thank you for participating in the meeting/conference call yesterday
afternoon. I know it was helpful to go through the Synthetic Lease assumptions with everyone on board. I met with Dave yesterday evening and briefly discussed his timing (ASAP) on meeting with Joe Sutton and his expectations (very high) on the Moore presentation. I referenced oversizing the amount of the Synthetic Lease in order to keep the Canadian banks happy on the 90% Enron guarantee. He agreed that the economics in the dash should still reflect the lower actual amount to be drawn down (currently U.S. $169MM). Please note below his requests and delegated responsibilities in (brackets) below: Dave requested I revise the proposal (Adam) to show add'l NPV and IRR comparisons based on MAIN, ComEd and possibly ICF, and a 30 Yr, GENCO comparison (Kate). Given the recent downward shift in some of the curves we may need to recompute our existing NPV and IRR #'s also (Kate). Besides furnishing a graph for the referenced curves, I need to submit GENCO's capital cost comparison for peakers in the marketplace (Ben). Further, based on the 30 year amortization, I need to show a graph of the build up of the components of capacity price and a break even earnings accrual price (Miguel). I will need comparisons from GENCO of these two graphs as well as a chart comparing start costs, heat rate and Var. O&M contrasting the Moore Project with the GENCO peakers (Don and/or Jynsung or Clement or Ben). In addition, Dave asked to get a Draft copy of the DASH ASAP (Chip). Dave does not want to circulate the DASH for signature until he has met with Sutton. Thanks for your help. Thomas.
|